UK data watchdog 'looking into' Google+ mission creep
I'll be looking for the results of this with interest. The UK and European courts have been previously successful in standing up to Big IT Business, so I'm hopeful they can do it again.
Exclusive Blighty's Information Commissioner's Office is currently "looking into" Google's recent ID verification rejig, The Register has learned.
I'll be looking for the results of this with interest. The UK and European courts have been previously successful in standing up to Big IT Business, so I'm hopeful they can do it again.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-27 02:54 pm (UTC)(emphasis mine)
This worries me. If this is what it says it is, my RL profile is going to get deleted, because I made it private - not searchable, and many of the fields locked down to viewable only by me. Does anyone know if I'm interpreting this incorrectly? I sure hope I am, because it makes no sense for Google to offer up the ability to keep one's profile private and then retaliate against that by summarily deleting all private profiles.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-27 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-27 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-27 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-27 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-27 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-27 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-27 06:38 pm (UTC)I carefully wnt through all my gmail accounts last night and deleted all profile info. I feel slightly better now.
Something in comments of the original article (#7, I think) highlights that using a 'Real' name in Google+ results in this name being used in your Google Profile, which propagates across all the Google services you use. That scares me!
no subject
Date: 2011-07-28 01:07 am (UTC)